REPORT ON GROUP ASSESSMENT PROCESS
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE GROUP
- Type of group
- Placement
- Group features: size, sexual composition, others.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE EPISODES
- Date/s
- Placement/s
- Episode’s total time:
- Recorded time
- Type of recording:
3. AGENTS
- Number of agents
- Description of their expertise
- Coincidence indexes
- Criteria and procedures of final agreements
4. ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS
- Brief description of protocols, scales, questionnaires, checklist… used for.
(Test liability, standardization and validity indexes, authorship, etc).
(MATERIAL SHOULD BE PLACED AT annexes)
5. DATA ANALYSIS (areas)
5.1. CONTENT VARIABLES
- Aims and working objectives
- Formal roles (deviant behaviors, compliance, complementary roles…)
- Nature of tasks (supra-ordinal tasks, creative, etc.)
- Leadership
- Decision making process (group think process)
- Individual behavior analysis
- Formal norms (types, degree of acceptance…)
- Overall work process: target-division-coordination-integration
5.2. PROCESS VARIABLES
- Group cohesion
- Memberships
- Communication
- Informal roles (deviant behaviors, compliance, idiosyncratic credits…)
- Active participation (social loafing, de-motivation, social facilitation…)
- Conflicts and power positions
- Informal norms
- Working climate and personal motivation/satisfaction (alienation, HWT*)
- Group culture
6. GRAPHICS AND CHARTS (They could be placed in chapter 5)
7. GROUP DIAGNOSIS
- Group developmental stage
- Detected problems in certain areas
- Short/medium/long-term group forecasts
- Overall assessment of the group functioning
- Improvement suggestions
8. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
9. ANNEXES (assessment instruments)
• HWT: High working team.
UMAMI, UMAMI, UMAMI is the best!
ReplyDeleteThis work was very hard, because you have to look for lots of things and coordinate with your patner and all these things, but I think that in my group we have all learn a lot about group dynamics and cohesion, roles, norms... in a practical way after studying these concepts, and we have also grow as a good group, we are more close now :)
ReplyDeletePilar Díaz-Pavón Mañosa 1ºA
I agree, but, in our case, It would have been nice to find more collaboration from the observed group. They were teens, though... I highly discourage coward and impatient people like me to work with teenagers: they will tear your flesh down...
DeleteCamilo Ábalos (1st A, Psychology of Groups)